Skip to content


Perk Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 113
AppellantPerk
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
.....court of ohio no. 590. decided december 8, 1969 19 ohio st. 2d 1, 249 n. e. 2d 525, appeal dismissed. gerald a. donahue and donald m. robiner for appellant. john t. corrigan, pro se, and john l. dowling for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mississippi power & light v. capital elec. pow. assn., 396 u.s. 113 (1969) 396 u.s. 113 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court mississippi power & light v. capital elec. pow. assn., 396 u.s. 113 (1969) 396 u.s. 113 mississippi power & light co. v. capital electric power assn. appeal from the supreme.....
Judgment:
PERK v. OHIO - 396 U.S. 113 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court PERK v. OHIO, 396 U.S. 113 (1969) 396 U.S. 113

PERK, AUDITOR OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY v. OHIO EX REL. CORRIGAN, PROSECUTING
ATTORNEY OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO No. 590.
Decided December 8, 1969

19 Ohio St. 2d 1, 249 N. E. 2d 525, appeal dismissed.

Gerald A. Donahue and Donald M. Robiner for appellant.

John T. Corrigan, pro se, and John L. Dowling for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., <a href="/102230"> 396 U.S. 113 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 113 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT v. CAPITAL ELEC. POW. ASSN., 396 U.S. 113 (1969) 396 U.S. 113

MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO. v. CAPITAL ELECTRIC POWER ASSN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
No. 611.
Decided December 8, 1969

222 So.2d 399, appeal dismissed.

Bernard G. Segal, Samuel D. Slade, Sherwood W. Wise, Garner W. Green, and Joshua Green for appellant.

T. Harvey Hedgepeth for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 396 U.S. 113, 114




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //