Skip to content


Balthazar Vs. Mari Ltd. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 114
AppellantBalthazar
RespondentMari Ltd.
Excerpt:
..... (1969) 396 u.s. 114 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court mathis v. nelson, 396 u.s. 114 (1969) 396 u.s. 114 mathis v. nelson, warden appeal from the supreme court of california no. 620, misc. decided december 8, 1969 70 cal. 2d 467, 450 p.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, albert w. harris, jr., assistant attorney general, and robert r. granucci, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 396 u.s. 114, 115
Judgment:
BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD. - 396 U.S. 114 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court BALTHAZAR v. MARI LTD., 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

BALTHAZAR ET UX. v. MARI LTD. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS No. 593.
Decided December 8, 1969

301 F. Supp. 103, affirmed.

Marshall Patner for appellants.

Maurice P. Raizes for Mari Ltd. et al., and Daniel P. Coman, Thomas E. Brannigan, and Dean H. Bilton for Boyle, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MATHIS v. NELSON, <a href="/102231"> 396 U.S. 114 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 114 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MATHIS v. NELSON, 396 U.S. 114 (1969) 396 U.S. 114

MATHIS v. NELSON, WARDEN
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 620, Misc.
Decided December 8, 1969

70 Cal. 2d 467, 450 P.2d 290, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 114, 115




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //