Skip to content


Carlos Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 119
AppellantCarlos
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....new york no. 524. decided december 8, 1969 certiorari granted; 24 n. y. 2d 865, 248 n. e. 2d 924, reversed. herald price fahringer and eugene gressman for petitioner. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice and mr. justice harlan are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. however, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in mr. justice harlan's separate opinion in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 (1966). page 396 u.s. 119, 120
Judgment:
CARLOS v. NEW YORK - 396 U.S. 119 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court CARLOS v. NEW YORK, 396 U.S. 119 (1969) 396 U.S. 119

CARLOS v. NEW YORK
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 524.
Decided December 8, 1969

Certiorari granted; 24 N. Y. 2d 865, 248 N. E. 2d 924, reversed.

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in MR. JUSTICE HARLAN'S separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 (1966).

Page 396 U.S. 119, 120




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //