Skip to content


Washum Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 18
AppellantWashum
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
washum v. united states - 396 u.s. 18 (1969) u.s. supreme court washum v. united states, 396 u.s. 18 (1969) 396 u.s. 18 washum, dba los angeles-yuma freight lines, et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of arizona no. 374. decided october 27, 1969 affirmed. james w. wrape and robert e. joyner for appellants. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, robert w. ginnane, and nahum litt for the united states et al., and robert y. schureman for consolidated copperstate lines et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. cox, v. tennessee, 396 u.s. 18 (1969) 396 u.s. 18 (1969) "> u.s......
Judgment:
WASHUM v. UNITED STATES - 396 U.S. 18 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court WASHUM v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 18 (1969) 396 U.S. 18

WASHUM, DBA LOS ANGELES-YUMA FREIGHT LINES, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
No. 374.
Decided October 27, 1969

Affirmed.

James W. Wrape and Robert E. Joyner for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Robert Y. Schureman for Consolidated Copperstate Lines et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


COX, v. TENNESSEE, <a href="/102252"> 396 U.S. 18 </a> (1969) 396 U.S. 18 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court COX, v. TENNESSEE, 396 U.S. 18 (1969) 396 U.S. 18

COX, GUARDIAN v. TENNESSEE, BY AND THROUGH ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
No. 430.
Decided October 27, 1969

___ Tenn. ___, 439 S. W. 2d 267, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Thomas F. Turley, Jr., for appellant.

Thomas E. Fox, Deputy Attorney General of Tennessee, and C. Hayes Cooney, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 18, 19




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //