Skip to content


Bisenius Vs. Karns - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number395 U.S. 709
AppellantBisenius
RespondentKarns
Excerpt:
.....federal question. stanbridge v. new york, 395 u.s. 709 (1969) 395 u.s. 709 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court stanbridge v. new york, 395 u.s. 709 (1969) 395 u.s. 709 stanbridge v. new york. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of new york. no. 208, misc. decided june 16, 1969. certiorari granted; 21 n. y. 2d 706, 794; 234 n. e. 2d 698, 235 n. e. 2d 456, vacated and remanded. william cahn for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of bruton v. united states, 391 u.s. 123 . page 395 u.s. 709, 710
Judgment:
BISENIUS v. KARNS - 395 U.S. 709 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court BISENIUS v. KARNS, 395 U.S. 709 (1969) 395 U.S. 709

BISENIUS v. KARNS, COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 1357.
Decided June 16, 1969.

42 Wis. 2d 42, 165 N. W. 2d 377, appeal dismissed.

S. A. Schapiro for appellant.

Robert W. Warren, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Albert Harriman and Robert D. Martinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, <a href="/102299"> 395 U.S. 709 </a> (1969) 395 U.S. 709 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK, 395 U.S. 709 (1969) 395 U.S. 709

STANBRIDGE v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 208, Misc.
Decided June 16, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 706, 794; 234 N. E. 2d 698, 235 N. E. 2d 456, vacated and remanded.

William Cahn for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 .

Page 395 U.S. 709, 710




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //