Skip to content


Mattiello Vs. Connecticut - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number395 U.S. 209
AppellantMattiello
RespondentConnecticut
Excerpt:
mattiello v. connecticut - 395 u.s. 209 (1969) u.s. supreme court mattiello v. connecticut, 395 u.s. 209 (1969) 395 u.s. 209 mattiello v. connecticut. appeal from the appellate division of the circuit court of connecticut. no. 150. argued december 11, 1968. decided may 26, 1969. 4 conn. cir. 55, 225 a. 2d 507, appeal dismissed. robert n. grosby argued the cause for appellant. with him on the briefs was joseph d. harbaugh. george f. carroll, jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. page 395 u.s. 209, 210
Judgment:
MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT - 395 U.S. 209 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT, 395 U.S. 209 (1969) 395 U.S. 209

MATTIELLO v. CONNECTICUT.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 150.
Argued December 11, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.

4 Conn. Cir. 55, 225 A. 2d 507, appeal dismissed.

Robert N. Grosby argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Joseph D. Harbaugh.

George F. Carroll, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

Page 395 U.S. 209, 210




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //