Skip to content


Southern Pacific Vs. Public Utilities Comm., California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 845
AppellantSouthern Pacific
RespondentPublic Utilities Comm., California
Excerpt:
southern pacific v. public utilities comm., california - 394 u.s. 845 (1969) u.s. supreme court southern pacific v. public utilities comm., california, 394 u.s. 845 (1969) 394 u.s. 845 southern pacific co. v. public utilities commission of california. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 1050. decided may 5, 1969. appeal dismissed. robert l. pierce for appellant. mary moran pajalich for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. southern pacific v. public utilities comm., california, 394 u.s. 845 (1969) .....
Judgment:
SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA - 394 U.S. 845 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969) 394 U.S. 845

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1050.
Decided May 5, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.

Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, <a href="/102343"> 394 U.S. 845 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 845 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM., CALIFORNIA, 394 U.S. 845 (1969) 394 U.S. 845

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1152.
Decided May 5, 1969.

Affirmed.

Robert L. Pierce for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich for appellee Public Utilities Commission of California.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 394 U.S. 845, 846




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //