Skip to content


Robinson Vs. Johnson - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 847
AppellantRobinson
RespondentJohnson
Excerpt:
.....p. 655. page 394 u.s. 847, 848 .....
Judgment:
ROBINSON v. JOHNSON - 394 U.S. 847 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court ROBINSON v. JOHNSON, 394 U.S. 847 (1969) 394 U.S. 847

ROBINSON ET AL. v. JOHNSON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 67.
Decided May 5, 1969.

Affirmed.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Thomas E. Brannigan, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, and Daniel P. Coman for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.

Page 394 U.S. 847, 848




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //