Skip to content


Estes Express Lines Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 718
AppellantEstes Express Lines
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
estes express lines v. united states - 394 u.s. 718 (1969) u.s. supreme court estes express lines v. united states, 394 u.s. 718 (1969) 394 u.s. 718 estes express lines et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of virginia. no. 1121. decided april 21, 1969. 292 f. supp. 842, affirmed. harry j. jordan for appellants. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, robert w. ginnane, and raymond m. zimmet for the united states et al., and william h. marx and h. merrill pasco for railway express agency, inc., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 394 u.s. 718, 719
Judgment:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES - 394 U.S. 718 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 718 (1969) 394 U.S. 718

ESTES EXPRESS LINES ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1121.
Decided April 21, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 842, affirmed.

Harry J. Jordan for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and William H. Marx and H. Merrill Pasco for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 394 U.S. 718, 719




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //