Skip to content


Anderson Vs. South Carolina - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 574
AppellantAnderson
RespondentSouth Carolina
Excerpt:
anderson v. south carolina - 394 u.s. 574 (1969) u.s. supreme court anderson v. south carolina, 394 u.s. 574 (1969) 394 u.s. 574 anderson v. south carolina. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 984, misc. decided april 7, 1969. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. robert l. chipley, jr., for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. the request for other relief is denied. davis v. united states, 394 u.s. 574 (1969) 394 u.s. 574 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court davis v. united states, 394 u.s. 574 (1969) 394 u.s. 574 davis v......
Judgment:
ANDERSON v. SOUTH CAROLINA - 394 U.S. 574 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court ANDERSON v. SOUTH CAROLINA, 394 U.S. 574 (1969) 394 U.S. 574

ANDERSON v. SOUTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 984, Misc.
Decided April 7, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert L. Chipley, Jr., for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. The request for other relief is denied.


DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102374"> 394 U.S. 574 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 574 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 574 (1969) 394 U.S. 574

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 1146, Misc.
Decided April 7, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 393 F.2d 100 , vacated and remanded.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the views expressed by the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the papers in this case, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for a further hearing on such evidence as the petitioner may present on the question of his right to appeal.

Page 394 U.S. 574, 575




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //