Skip to content


Mrkonjic-ruzic Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 454
AppellantMrkonjic-ruzic
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
mrkonjic-ruzic v. united states - 394 u.s. 454 (1969) u.s. supreme court mrkonjic-ruzic v. united states, 394 u.s. 454 (1969) 394 u.s. 454 mrkonjic-ruzic v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 880. decided april 1, 1969. certiorari granted; 402 f.2d 836 , vacated and remanded. gregory s. stout for petitioner. solicitor general griswold, acting assistant attorney general kossack, and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the eastern district of california for further consideration in light of.....
Judgment:
MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES - 394 U.S. 454 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

MRKONJIC-RUZIC v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 880.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Certiorari granted; 402 F.2d 836 , vacated and remanded.

Gregory S. Stout for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kossack, and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California for further consideration in light of Alderman v. United States, ante, p. 165.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


NICKOLICH v. OHIO, <a href="/102383"> 394 U.S. 454 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 454 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court NICKOLICH v. OHIO, 394 U.S. 454 (1969) 394 U.S. 454

NICKOLICH v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 1052.
Decided April 1, 1969.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

George E. Tyack for appellant.

E. Raymond Morehart for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 394 U.S. 454, 455




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //