Skip to content


Mitchell Vs. Riddell - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 456
AppellantMitchell
RespondentRiddell
Excerpt:
.....court mitchell v. riddell, 394 u.s. 456 (1969) 394 u.s. 456 mitchell et al. v. riddell, district director of internal revenue, et al. appeal from the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 1044. decided april 1, 1969. 402 f.2d 842 , appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general walters, and gilbert e. andrews for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. macquarrie v. mclaughlin, 394 u.s. 456 (1969) 394 u.s. 456 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court macquarrie v......
Judgment:
MITCHELL v. RIDDELL - 394 U.S. 456 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court MITCHELL v. RIDDELL, 394 U.S. 456 (1969) 394 U.S. 456

MITCHELL ET AL. v. RIDDELL, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 1044.
Decided April 1, 1969.

402 F.2d 842 , appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, and Gilbert E. Andrews for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, <a href="/102385"> 394 U.S. 456 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 456 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, 394 U.S. 456 (1969) 394 U.S. 456

MacQUARRIE v. McLAUGHLIN, REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1483, Misc.
Decided April 1, 1969.

294 F. Supp. 176, affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 394 U.S. 456, 457




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //