Skip to content


Dunbar-stanley Studios, Inc. Vs. City of Mobile - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number394 U.S. 212
AppellantDunbar-stanley Studios, Inc.
RespondentCity of Mobile
Excerpt:
.....appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. powers v. perry circuit court, 394 u.s. 212 (1969) 394 u.s. 212 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court powers v. perry circuit court, 394 u.s. 212 (1969) 394 u.s. 212 powers et al. v. perry circuit court et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of indiana. no. 559, misc. decided march 10, 1969. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. john j. dillon, attorney general of indiana, and richard v. bennett, deputy attorney general, for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the.....
Judgment:
DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE - 394 U.S. 212 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212

DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 377.
Decided March 10, 1969.

282 Ala. 386, 211 So.2d 803, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

J. Edward Thornton and Glen B. Hardymon for appellant.

Barry Hess for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, <a href="/102408"> 394 U.S. 212 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 212 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court POWERS v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT, 394 U.S. 212 (1969) 394 U.S. 212

POWERS ET AL. v. PERRY CIRCUIT COURT ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 559, Misc.
Decided March 10, 1969.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

John J. Dillon, Attorney General of Indiana, and Richard V. Bennett, Deputy Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Indiana for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, 393 U.S. 374 .

Page 394 U.S. 212, 213




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //