Skip to content


Morgan Vs. Board of Forestry of Oregon - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 529
AppellantMorgan
RespondentBoard of Forestry of Oregon
Excerpt:
.....court of oregon. no. 632. decided february 24, 1969. 250 ore. 460, 443 p.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. ervin w. potter for appellants. robert y. thornton, attorney general of oregon, and thomas c. stacer, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. foran v. weinhoff, 393 u.s. 529 (1969) 393 u.s. 529 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court foran v. weinhoff, 393 u.s. 529 (1969) 393 u.s. 529 foran v. weinhoff et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of.....
Judgment:
MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON - 393 U.S. 529 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court MORGAN v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

MORGAN ET AL. v. BOARD OF FORESTRY OF OREGON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON.
No. 632.
Decided February 24, 1969.

250 Ore. 460, 443 P.2d 236, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ervin W. Potter for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Thomas C. Stacer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


FORAN v. WEINHOFF, <a href="/102426"> 393 U.S. 529 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 529 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court FORAN v. WEINHOFF, 393 U.S. 529 (1969) 393 U.S. 529

FORAN v. WEINHOFF ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 870.
Decided February 24, 1969.

291 F. Supp. 498, appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, and Robert V. Zener for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 529, 530




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //