Skip to content


Kohler Vs. Tugwell - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 531
AppellantKohler
RespondentTugwell
Excerpt:
.....is affirmed. meeks v. flourney, 393 u.s. 531 (1969) 393 u.s. 531 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court meeks v. flourney, 393 u.s. 531 (1969) 393 u.s. 531 meeks v. flourney, sheriff, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of texas. no. 81, misc. decided february 24, 1969. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. crawford c. martin, attorney general of texas, nola white, first assistant attorney general, a. j. carubbi, jr., executive assistant attorney general, and robert c. flowers, lonny f. zwiener, and gilbert j. pena, assistant attorneys general, for respondents. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the.....
Judgment:
KOHLER v. TUGWELL - 393 U.S. 531 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court KOHLER v. TUGWELL, 393 U.S. 531 (1969) 393 U.S. 531

KOHLER ET AL. v. TUGWELL, TREASURER OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 933.
Decided February 24, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 978, affirmed.

Donald V. Organ for appellants.

Dorothy Wolbrette and William P. Curry, Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, <a href="/102428"> 393 U.S. 531 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 531 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, 393 U.S. 531 (1969) 393 U.S. 531

MEEKS v. FLOURNEY, SHERIFF, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS.
No. 81, Misc.
Decided February 24, 1969.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, A. J. Carubbi, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Flowers, Lonny F. Zwiener, and Gilbert J. Pena, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Texas for further consideration in light of Smith v. Hooey, ante, p. 374.

Page 393 U.S. 531, 532




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //