Skip to content


Sutton Vs. Adams - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 404
AppellantSutton
RespondentAdams
Excerpt:
..... 212 so.2d 1, appeal dismissed. milton e. grusmark for appellant. earl faircloth, attorney general of florida, pro se, and robert a. chastain and wilson w. wright, assistant attorneys general, for appellees. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black and mr. justice harlan would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. backer v. rockefeller, 393 u.s. 404 (1969) 393 u.s. 404 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court backer v. rockefeller, 393 u.s. 404 (1969) 393 u.s. 404 backer v. rockefeller, governor of new york. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york. no. 852. decided january 20, 1969. .....
Judgment:
SUTTON v. ADAMS - 393 U.S. 404 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court SUTTON v. ADAMS, 393 U.S. 404 (1969) 393 U.S. 404

SUTTON v. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 726.
Decided January 20, 1969.

212 So.2d 1, appeal dismissed.

Milton E. Grusmark for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, pro se, and Robert A. Chastain and Wilson W. Wright, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.


BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, <a href="/102448"> 393 U.S. 404 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 404 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, 393 U.S. 404 (1969) 393 U.S. 404

BACKER v. ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 852.
Decided January 20, 1969.

292 F. Supp. 851, affirmed.

Jerome M. Kay for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 393 U.S. 404, 405




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //