Skip to content


Dahl Vs. Republican State Committee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 408
AppellantDahl
RespondentRepublican State Committee
Excerpt:
dahl v. republican state committee - 393 u.s. 408 (1969) u.s. supreme court dahl v. republican state committee, 393 u.s. 408 (1969) 393 u.s. 408 dahl et al. v. republican state committee et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of washington. no. 596. decided january 20, 1969. vacated and remanded. alfred j. schweppe for appellants. bradley t. jones for appellees. per curiam. the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the district court may enter a fresh decree from which appellants may, if they wish, perfect a timely appeal to the court of appeals. moody v. flowers, 387 u.s. 97 . mr. justice douglas dissents. mr. justice harlan,.....
Judgment:
DAHL v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE - 393 U.S. 408 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court DAHL v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE, 393 U.S. 408 (1969) 393 U.S. 408

DAHL ET AL. v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 596.
Decided January 20, 1969.

Vacated and remanded.

Alfred J. Schweppe for appellants.

Bradley T. Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellants may, if they wish, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, believing that jurisdiction lies in this Court, would affirm the judgment below.

Page 393 U.S. 408, 409




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //