Skip to content


Hilliard Vs. City of Gainesville - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 321
AppellantHilliard
RespondentCity of Gainesville
Excerpt:
.....from the supreme court of florida. no. 745. decided january 13, 1969. 213 so.2d 689, appeal dismissed. richard w. wilson for appellant. osee r. fagan for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. mid-valley pipeline co. v. king, 393 u.s. 321 (1969) 393 u.s. 321 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court mid-valley pipeline co. v. king, 393 u.s. 321 (1969) 393 u.s. 321 mid-valley pipeline co. v. king, commissioner of revenue, et al. appeal from the supreme court of tennessee. no. 756. decided january 13, 1969. 221 tenn. 724, 431 s. w. 2d.....
Judgment:
HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE - 393 U.S. 321 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, 393 U.S. 321 (1969) 393 U.S. 321

HILLIARD v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 745.
Decided January 13, 1969.

213 So.2d 689, appeal dismissed.

Richard W. Wilson for appellant.

Osee R. Fagan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, <a href="/102467"> 393 U.S. 321 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 321 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, 393 U.S. 321 (1969) 393 U.S. 321

MID-VALLEY PIPELINE CO. v. KING, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE.
No. 756.
Decided January 13, 1969.

221 Tenn. 724, 431 S. W. 2d 277, appeal dismissed.

H. Vincent E. Mitchell and J. Martin Regan for appellant.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, and Milton P. Rice, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 321, 322




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //