Skip to content


Lee Vs. U.S. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number393 U.S. 1053
AppellantLee
RespondentU.S.
Excerpt:
lee v. u.s. - 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) u.s. supreme court lee v. u.s. , 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) 393 u.s. 1053 ardell lee, etc., et al., petitioners, v. united states. no. 782. supreme court of the united states january 20, 1969 lee s. kreindler and samuel n. hecsh, for petitioners. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general weisl, morton hollander and leonard schaitman, for the united states. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. denied. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ lee v. u.s. 393 u.s. 1053 (1969) ]
Judgment:
LEE v. U.S. - 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court LEE v. U.S. , 393 U.S. 1053 (1969)

393 U.S. 1053

Ardell LEE, etc., et al., petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 782.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 20, 1969

Lee S. Kreindler and Samuel N. Hecsh, for petitioners.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Leonard Schaitman, for the United States.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.[ Lee v. U.S. 393 U.S. 1053 (1969) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //