Skip to content


Public Utility Dist. Vs. City of Seattle - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 803
AppellantPublic Utility Dist.
RespondentCity of Seattle
Excerpt:
.....a. l. newbould and richard s. white, for city of seattle. solicitor general griswold, for the united states, amicus curiae. the petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed under rule 60.[ public utility dist. v. city of seattle 396 u.s. 803 (1969) ] .....
Judgment:
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE - 396 U.S. 803 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. CITY OF SEATTLE , 396 U.S. 803 (1969)

396 U.S. 803

PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
v.
CITY OF SEATTLE.
No. 2.

CITY OF SEATTLE
v.
PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. NO. 1 OF PEND OREILLE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
No. 3.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1969.

October Term, 1969.

October 13, 1969

Clarence C. Dill, William G. Ennis, and Bennett Boskey, for Public Utility Dist. No. 1 of Pend Oreille County.

A. L. Newbould and Richard S. White, for City of Seattle.

Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States, amicus curiae.

The petitions for writs of certiorari dismissed under Rule 60.[ Public Utility Dist. v. City of Seattle 396 U.S. 803 (1969) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //