Skip to content


Follette Vs. Comacho - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number398 U.S. 279
AppellantFollette
RespondentComacho
Excerpt:
..... 398 u.s. 279 follette, warden v. comacho on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit no. 1394. decided june 1, 1970 certiorari granted; 421 f.2d 822 , vacated and remanded. per curiam. the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals for further consideration in light of mcmann v. richardson, 397 u.s. 759 . mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. higgins v. united states, 398 u.s. 279 (1970) 398 u.s. 279 (1970) "> u.s. supreme court higgins v. united states, 398.....
Judgment:
FOLLETTE v. COMACHO - 398 U.S. 279 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court FOLLETTE v. COMACHO, 398 U.S. 279 (1970) 398 U.S. 279

FOLLETTE, WARDEN v. COMACHO
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1394.
Decided June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 421 F.2d 822 , vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 .

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/102558"> 398 U.S. 279 </a> (1970) 398 U.S. 279 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES, 398 U.S. 279 (1970) 398 U.S. 279

HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT No. 1183, Misc.
Decided June 1, 1970

Certiorari granted; 416 F.2d 406 , vacated and remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 .

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 398 U.S. 279, 280




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //