Skip to content


Garden State Transit Co., Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 661
AppellantGarden State Transit Co., Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
garden state transit co., inc. v. united states - 397 u.s. 661 (1970) u.s. supreme court reports garden state transit co., inc. v. united states, 397 u.s. 661 (1970) garden state transit co., inc. v. united states, 397 u.s. 661 (1970) 397 u.s. 661 garden state transit co., inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of new jersey no. 1323. decided april 27, 1970 affirmed. herman b. j. weckstein for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, robert w. ginnane, fritz r. kahn, and raymond m. zimmet for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 397 u.s. 661, 662
Judgment:
GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES - 397 U.S. 661 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court Reports GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 661 (1970) GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 661 (1970) 397 U.S. 661

GARDEN STATE TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 1323.
Decided April 27, 1970

Affirmed.

Herman B. J. Weckstein for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 397 U.S. 661, 662




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //