Skip to content


Friedman Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 317
AppellantFriedman
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
friedman v. new york - 397 u.s. 317 (1970) u.s. supreme court friedman v. new york, 397 u.s. 317 (1970) 397 u.s. 317 friedman v. new york appeal from the court of appeals of new york no. 1137. decided march 23, 1970 24 n. y. 2d 528, 249 n. e. 2d 369, appeal dismissed. marx leva, alexander b. hawes, and richard e. nolan for appellant. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, ruth kessler toch, solicitor general, and jeremiah jochnowitz, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Judgment:
FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK - 397 U.S. 317 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 397 U.S. 317 (1970) 397 U.S. 317

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 1137.
Decided March 23, 1970

24 N. Y. 2d 528, 249 N. E. 2d 369, appeal dismissed.

Marx Leva, Alexander B. Hawes, and Richard E. Nolan for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Jeremiah Jochnowitz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //