Skip to content


Shaffer Vs. Bridges - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 94
AppellantShaffer
RespondentBridges
Excerpt:
shaffer v. bridges - 397 u.s. 94 (1970) u.s. supreme court shaffer v. bridges, 397 u.s. 94 (1970) 397 u.s. 94 shaffer v. bridges appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of mississippi no. 535, misc. decided february 27, 1970 295 f. supp. 869, appeal dismissed. james robertson and lawrence a. aschenbrenner for appellant. a. f. summer, attorney general of mississippi, and will s. wells, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion to dismiss is granted and the case is dismissed as moot.
Judgment:
SHAFFER v. BRIDGES - 397 U.S. 94 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court SHAFFER v. BRIDGES, 397 U.S. 94 (1970) 397 U.S. 94

SHAFFER v. BRIDGES
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 535, Misc.
Decided February 27, 1970

295 F. Supp. 869, appeal dismissed.

James Robertson and Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Will S. Wells, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the case is dismissed as moot.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //