Skip to content


New York Feed Co., Inc., Vs. Leary - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 98
AppellantNew York Feed Co., Inc.,
RespondentLeary
Excerpt:
new york feed co., inc., v. leary - 397 u.s. 98 (1970) u.s. supreme court new york feed co., inc., v. leary, 397 u.s. 98 (1970) 397 u.s. 98 new york feed co., inc., et al. v. leary et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york no. 992. decided february 27, 1970 * [ footnote * ] together with no. 998, milky way productions, inc., et al. v. leary et al., also on appeal from the same court. 305 f. supp. 288, affirmed. herald price fahringer for appellants in no. 992. ralph j. schwarz, jr., and albert b. gerber for appellants in no. 998. j. lee rankin and stanley buchsbaum for appellee leary in both cases, and frank s. hogan, pro se, and michael r. juviler for appellee hogan in both.....
Judgment:
NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., v. LEARY - 397 U.S. 98 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., v. LEARY, 397 U.S. 98 (1970) 397 U.S. 98

NEW YORK FEED CO., INC., ET AL. v. LEARY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 992.
Decided February 27, 1970 *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 998, Milky Way Productions, Inc., et al. v. Leary et al., also on appeal from the same court.

305 F. Supp. 288, affirmed.

Herald Price Fahringer for appellants in No. 992. Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., and Albert B. Gerber for appellants in No. 998.

J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum for appellee Leary in both cases, and Frank S. Hogan, pro se, and Michael R. Juviler for appellee Hogan in both cases. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, filed a motion to dismiss or affirm for the Attorney General of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.

Page 397 U.S. 98, 99




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //