Skip to content


Turner Vs. Clay - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 39
AppellantTurner
RespondentClay
Excerpt:
turner v. clay - 397 u.s. 39 (1970) u.s. supreme court turner v. clay, 397 u.s. 39 (1970) 397 u.s. 39 turner et al. v. clay et al. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 982. decided february 24, 1970 253 s. c. 209, 169 s. e. 2d 617, appeal dismissed. harry m. lightsey, jr., for appellants. huger sinkler for clay et al., and daniel r. mcleod, attorney general of south carolina, and c. tolbert goolsby, jr., assistant attorney general, for thornton, secretary of state of south carolina, appellees. per curiam. the motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 397 u.s. 39, 40
Judgment:
TURNER v. CLAY - 397 U.S. 39 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court TURNER v. CLAY, 397 U.S. 39 (1970) 397 U.S. 39

TURNER ET AL. v. CLAY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 982.
Decided February 24, 1970

253 S. C. 209, 169 S. E. 2d 617, appeal dismissed.

Harry M. Lightsey, Jr., for appellants.

Huger Sinkler for Clay et al., and Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Thornton, Secretary of State of South Carolina, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 397 U.S. 39, 40




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //