Skip to content


Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 41
AppellantChemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.,
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
chemical leaman tank lines, inc., v. united states - 397 u.s. 41 (1970) u.s. supreme court chemical leaman tank lines, inc., v. united states, 397 u.s. 41 (1970) 397 u.s. 41 chemical leaman tank lines, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of mississippi. no. 880. decided february 24, 1970 301 f. supp. 258, affirmed. phineas stevens, thomas e. james, and harry c. ames, jr., for appellants. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, howard e. shapiro, fritz r. kahn, and jerome e. sharfman for the united states et al., and earl t. thomas for bell, dba bell transport co., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the.....
Judgment:
CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES - 397 U.S. 41 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES, 397 U.S. 41 (1970) 397 U.S. 41

CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 880.
Decided February 24, 1970

301 F. Supp. 258, affirmed.

Phineas Stevens, Thomas E. James, and Harry C. Ames, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome E. Sharfman for the United States et al., and Earl T. Thomas for Bell, dba Bell Transport Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //