Skip to content


Johnson Vs. Wasserman - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 554
AppellantJohnson
RespondentWasserman
Excerpt:
.....et al. appeal from the supreme court of ohio no. 832. decided february 2, 1970 appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. alvin a. fein for appellants. john t. corrigan and john l. dowling for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. kirk v. board of regents of university of california, 396 u.s. 554 (1970) 396 u.s. 554 (1970) "> u.s. supreme court kirk v. board of regents of university of california, 396 u.s. 554 (1970) 396 u.s. 554 kirk v. board of regents of the university of california appeal from the court of appeal of.....
Judgment:
JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN - 396 U.S. 554 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554

JOHNSON ET AL. v. WASSERMAN, JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 832.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Alvin A. Fein for appellants.

John T. Corrigan and John L. Dowling for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="/102653"> 396 U.S. 554 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 554 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554

KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 836.
Decided February 2, 1970

273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 78 Cal. Rptr. 260, appeal dismissed.

Charles R. B. Kirk, Norman Dorsen, Clark Byse, and William W. Van Alstyne for appellant.

Thomas J. Cunningham and David W. Louisell for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 396 U.S. 554, 555




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //