Skip to content


First Federal Sav. and Loan A., Providence Vs. Langton - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 374
AppellantFirst Federal Sav. and Loan A., Providence
RespondentLangton
Excerpt:
.....of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 396 u.s. 374, 375 .....
Judgment:
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN A., PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON - 396 U.S. 374 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN A., PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, 396 U.S. 374 (1970) 396 U.S. 374

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDENCE v. LANGTON, TAX
ADMINISTRATOR
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND No. 288.
Decided January 19, 1970

___ R. I. ___, 251 A. 2d 170, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Max Winograd for appellant.

Herbert F. De Simone, Attorney General of Rhode Island, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 396 U.S. 374, 375




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //