Skip to content


FishkIn Vs. United States Civil Service Commission - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number396 U.S. 278
AppellantFishkin
RespondentUnited States Civil Service Commission
Excerpt:
fishkin v. united states civil service commission - 396 u.s. 278 (1970) u.s. supreme court fishkin v. united states civil service commission, 396 u.s. 278 (1970) 396 u.s. 278 fishkin et al. v. united states civil service commission et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of california no. 681. decided january 12, 1970 309 f. supp. 40, appeal dismissed. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and richard l. mayers, deputy attorney general, for appellant the state of california. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general ruckelshaus, and alan s. rosenthal for appellees. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by rule.....
Judgment:
FISHKIN v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION - 396 U.S. 278 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court FISHKIN v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, 396 U.S. 278 (1970) 396 U.S. 278

FISHKIN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA No. 681.
Decided January 12, 1970

309 F. Supp. 40, appeal dismissed.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Richard L. Mayers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellant the State of California.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Alan S. Rosenthal for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


BONOMO v. JONES, <a href="/102680"> 396 U.S. 278 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 278 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court BONOMO v. JONES, 396 U.S. 278 (1970) 396 U.S. 278

BONOMO ET AL. v. JONES
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 662.
Decided January 12, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert E. Dauer for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 396 U.S. 278, 279




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //