Skip to content


Capital Southwest Corp. Vs. Calvert - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 321
AppellantCapital Southwest Corp.
RespondentCalvert
Excerpt:
..... 397 u.s. 321 capital southwest corporation et al. v. robert s. calvert, comptroller, et al. no. 1130. supreme court of the united states march 23, 1970 j. sam winters, henry d. akin, jr., and william d. powell, for appellants. crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, pro se. nola white, first asst. atty. gen., alfred walker, executive asst. atty. gen., john r. grace and william edward allen, asst. attys. gen., and william b. hilgers, sp. asst. atty. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.[ capital southwest corp. v. calvert 397 u.s. 321 (1970) ]
Judgment:
CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP. v. CALVERT - 397 U.S. 321 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORP. v. CALVERT , 397 U.S. 321 (1970)

397 U.S. 321

CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION et al.
v.
Robert S. CALVERT, Comptroller, et al.
No. 1130.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 23, 1970

J. Sam Winters, Henry D. Akin, Jr., and William D. Powell, for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, pro se.

Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Alfred Walker, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., John R. Grace and William Edward Allen, Asst. Attys. Gen., and William B. Hilgers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.[ Capital Southwest Corp. v. Calvert 397 U.S. 321 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //