Skip to content


S Vs. City of New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 597
AppellantS
RespondentCity of New York
Excerpt:
.....stanley buchsbaum, and robert t. hartmann, for appellee. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals of new york for further consideration in light of in re winship, 397 u.s. 358 . the chief justice and mr. justice stewart dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of the chief justice in in re winship, 397 u.s., at 375. mr. justice black dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in in re winship, 397 u.s., at 377.[ s v. city of new york 397 u.s. 597 (1970) ]
Judgment:
S v. CITY OF NEW YORK - 397 U.S. 597 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court S v. CITY OF NEW YORK , 397 U.S. 597 (1970)

397 U.S. 597

Richard S
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK.
No. 1478, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Jonathan A. Weiss, for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin, Stanley Buchsbaum, and Robert T. Hartmann, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of New York for further consideration in light of In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of The Chief Justice in In re Winship, 397 U.S., at 375.

Mr. Justice BLACK dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in In re Winship, 397 U.S., at 377.[ S v. City of New York 397 U.S. 597 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //