Skip to content


Hester Vs. Illinois - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 660
AppellantHester
Respondentillinois
Excerpt:
hester v. illinois - 397 u.s. 660 (1970) u.s. supreme court hester v. illinois , 397 u.s. 660 (1970) 397 u.s. 660 lee arthur hester, petitioner, v. state of illinois. no. 82. supreme court of the united states october term, 1969. april 27, 1970 marshall kaplan, chicago, ill., for petitioner. joel m. flaum, chicago, ill., for respondent. on writ of certiorari to the supreme court of illinois. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. mr. justice douglas, mr. justice brennan, and mr. justice marshall dissent.[ hester v. illinois 397 u.s. 660 (1970) ]
Judgment:
HESTER v. ILLINOIS - 397 U.S. 660 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court HESTER v. ILLINOIS , 397 U.S. 660 (1970)

397 U.S. 660

Lee Arthur HESTER, petitioner,
v.
State of ILLINOIS.
No. 82.

Supreme Court of the United States

October Term, 1969.

April 27, 1970

Marshall Kaplan, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

Joel M. Flaum, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, Mr. Justice BRENNAN, and Mr. Justice MARSHALL dissent.[ Hester v. Illinois 397 U.S. 660 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //