Skip to content


U S Vs. Rowell - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 662
AppellantU S
RespondentRowell
Excerpt:
.....(1970) u.s. supreme court u s v. rowell , 397 u.s. 662 (1970) 397 u.s. 662 united states v. howard eugene rowell. no. 863. supreme court of the united states april 27, 1970 solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general wilson, beatrice rosenberg, and mervyn hamburg, for the united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. per curiam. the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals is vacated. the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of buie v. united states, 396 u.s. 87 .[ u s v......
Judgment:
U S v. ROWELL - 397 U.S. 662 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court U S v. ROWELL , 397 U.S. 662 (1970)

397 U.S. 662

UNITED STATES
v.
Howard Eugene ROWELL.
No. 863.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1970

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Buie v. United States, 396 U.S. 87 .[ U S v. Rowell 397 U.S. 662 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //