Skip to content


Jefferson Vs. Hackney - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number397 U.S. 821
AppellantJefferson
RespondentHackney
Excerpt:
..... jefferson v. hackney , 397 u.s. 821 (1970) 397 u.s. 821 ruth j. jefferson et al. v. burton g. hackney, commissioner, department of public welfare of texas, et al. no. 1345, misc. supreme court of the united states may 4, 1970 ed j. polk and carl rachlin, for appellants. crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, nola white, first asst. atty. gen., pat bailey, executive asst. atty. gen., and w. o. shultz ii, asst. atty. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the northern district of texas for further consideration in light of rosado v. wyman, 397 u.s. 397 .[ jefferson v. hackney 397.....
Judgment:
JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY - 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)

397 U.S. 821

Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 .[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //