Skip to content


Roe Vs. Doe - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number420 U.S. 307
AppellantRoe
RespondentDoe
Excerpt:
..... ephraim s. london argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were franklin s. bonem, bonnie p. winawer, and helen l. buttenwieser. * [ footnote * ] ira m. millstein filed a brief for the association of american publishers, inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal. joseph onek filed a brief for the american psychiatric assn. et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 420 u.s. 307, 308
Judgment:
ROE v. DOE - 420 U.S. 307 (1975)
U.S. Supreme Court ROE v. DOE, 420 U.S. 307 (1975) 420 U.S. 307

ROE ET AL. v. DOE.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

No. 73-1446.

Argued December 18, 1974.
Decided February 19, 1975.

33 N. Y. 2d 902, 307 N. E. 2d 823, certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.

Marvin M. Karpatkin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Michael N. Pollet.

Ephraim S. London argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Franklin S. Bonem, Bonnie P. Winawer, and Helen L. Buttenwieser. *

[ Footnote * ] Ira M. Millstein filed a brief for the Association of American Publishers, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Joseph Onek filed a brief for the American Psychiatric Assn. et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 420 U.S. 307, 308




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //