Skip to content


Shell Oil Co. Vs. Dartt - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number434 U.S. 99
AppellantShell Oil Co.
RespondentDartt
Excerpt:
..... [ footnote * ] jay s. siegel, frank c. morris, jr., robert e. williams, and douglas s. mcdowell filed a brief for the equal employment advisory council as amicus curiae urging reversal. page 434 u.s. 99, 100 .....
Judgment:
SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT - 434 U.S. 99 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT, 434 U.S. 99 (1977) 434 U.S. 99

SHELL OIL CO. v. DARTT
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

No. 76-678.

Argued November 7, 1977
Decided November 29, 1977

539 F.2d 1256 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mary T. Matthies argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Brynn F. Aurelius.

Jefferson G. Greer argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. *

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[ Footnote * ] Jay S. Siegel, Frank C. Morris, Jr., Robert E. Williams, and Douglas S. McDowell filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.

Page 434 U.S. 99, 100




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //