Skip to content


Vorchheimer Vs. School District of Philadelphia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number430 U.S. 703
AppellantVorchheimer
RespondentSchool District of Philadelphia
Excerpt:
vorchheimer v. school district of philadelphia - 430 u.s. 703 (1977) u.s. supreme court vorchheimer v. school district of philadelphia, 430 u.s. 703 (1977) 430 u.s. 703 vorchheimer v. school district of philadelphia et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit no. 76-37. argued february 22, 1977 decided april 19, 1977 532 f.2d 880 , affirmed by an equally divided court. sharon k. wallis argued the cause for petitioner. with her on the briefs were ruth bader ginsburg and melvin l. wulf. alan h. gilbert argued the cause for respondents. with him on the brief was edward b. soken. * [ footnote * ] solicitor general bork filed a brief for the united states as amicus curiae. per.....
Judgment:
VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA - 430 U.S. 703 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, 430 U.S. 703 (1977) 430 U.S. 703

VORCHHEIMER v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 76-37.

Argued February 22, 1977
Decided April 19, 1977

532 F.2d 880 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Sharon K. Wallis argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Melvin L. Wulf.

Alan H. Gilbert argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Edward B. Soken. *

[ Footnote * ] Solicitor General Bork filed a brief for the United States as amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 430 U.S. 703, 704




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //