Skip to content


Maness Vs. Wainwright - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number430 U.S. 550
AppellantManess
RespondentWainwright
Excerpt:
.....of appeals for the fifth circuit no. 75-6909. argued march 22-23, 1977 decided march 29, 1977 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 512 f.2d 88 . bennett h. brummer argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs was albert g. caruana. arthur joel berger, assistant attorney general of florida, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. with him on the brief were robert l. shevin, attorney general, and william l. rogers, special assistant attorney general. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 430 u.s. 550, 551
Judgment:
MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT - 430 U.S. 550 (1977)
U.S. Supreme Court MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, 430 U.S. 550 (1977) 430 U.S. 550

MANESS v. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER
REHABILITATION OF FLORIDA
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 75-6909.

Argued March 22-23, 1977
Decided March 29, 1977

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 512 F.2d 88 .

Bennett H. Brummer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Albert G. Caruana.

Arthur Joel Berger, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent pro hac vice. With him on the brief were Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, and William L. Rogers, Special Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 430 U.S. 550, 551




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //