Skip to content


Carter Vs. Miller - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number434 U.S. 356
AppellantCarter
RespondentMiller
Excerpt:
carter v. miller - 434 u.s. 356 (1978) u.s. supreme court carter v. miller, 434 u.s. 356 (1978) 434 u.s. 356 carter, public vehicle license commissioner of chicago v. miller certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit no. 76-1171. argued november 29-30, 1977 decided january 17, 1978 547 f.2d 1314 , affirmed by an equally divided court. william r. quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were daniel pascale and robert retke. robert masur argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs were alan freedman, howard eglit, and david goldberger. * per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. mr. justice blackmun took no part in the.....
Judgment:
CARTER v. MILLER - 434 U.S. 356 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court CARTER v. MILLER, 434 U.S. 356 (1978) 434 U.S. 356

CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 76-1171.

Argued November 29-30, 1977
Decided January 17, 1978

547 F.2d 1314 , affirmed by an equally divided Court.

William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascale and Robert Retke.

Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger. *

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.

Page 434 U.S. 356, 357




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //