Skip to content


Pressler Vs. Blumenthal - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number434 U.S. 1028
AppellantPressler
RespondentBlumenthal
Excerpt:
pressler v. blumenthal - 434 u.s. 1028 (1978) u.s. supreme court pressler v. blumenthal , 434 u.s. 1028 (1978) 434 u.s. 1028 larry pressler, member, united states house of representatives v. w. m. blumenthal, secretary of the treasury, et al no. 77-450 supreme court of the united states january 16, 1978 the motion of james m. jeffords et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice rehnquist, concurring. in joining the summary affirmance of the judgment of the district court in this case, i think it important to point out that such affirmance does not necessarily reflect this court's agreement with the conclusion reached by the district court on the merits of the ascertainment.....
Judgment:
PRESSLER v. BLUMENTHAL - 434 U.S. 1028 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court PRESSLER v. BLUMENTHAL , 434 U.S. 1028 (1978)

434 U.S. 1028

Larry PRESSLER, Member, United States House of Representatives
v.
W. M. BLUMENTHAL, Secretary of the Treasury, et al
No. 77-450

Supreme Court of the United States

January 16, 1978

The motion of James M. Jeffords et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice REHNQUIST, concurring.

In joining the summary affirmance of the judgment of the District Court in this case, I think it important to point out that such affirmance does not necessarily reflect this Court's agreement with the conclusion reached by the District Court on the merits of the Ascertainment Clause ques-

Page 434 U.S. 1028 , 1029

tion. The District Court decided that appellant did have standing to litigate this issue by virtue of the fact that he was a Member of Congress, but decided the issue against him on the merits. Our "unexplicated affirmance" without opinion could rest as readily on our conclusion that appellant lacked standing to litigate the merits of the question as it could on agreement with the District Court's resolution of the merits of the question.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //