Skip to content


Vincent Vs. Texas - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number449 U.S. 199
AppellantVincent
RespondentTexas
Excerpt:
.....appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. the chief justice and justice powell would dismiss for want of jurisdiction. page 449 u.s. 199, 200 .....
Judgment:
VINCENT v. TEXAS - 449 U.S. 199 (1980)
U.S. Supreme Court VINCENT v. TEXAS, 449 U.S. 199 (1980) 449 U.S. 199

VINCENT v. TEXAS
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

No. 79-5962.

Argued November 5, 1980
Decided December 9, 1980

Appeal dismissed. Reported below: 586 S. W. 2d 880.

Robert D. McCutcheon, by appointment of the Court, 446 U.S. 934, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Douglas M. Becker, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Mark White, Attorney General, John W. Fainter, Jr., First Assistant Attorney General, and W. Barton Boling and Dawn Bruner, Assistant Attorneys General.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and JUSTICE POWELL would dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Page 449 U.S. 199, 200




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //