Skip to content


Westinghouse Electric Corp. Vs. Vaughn - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number466 U.S. 521
AppellantWestinghouse Electric Corp.
RespondentVaughn
Excerpt:
westinghouse electric corp. v. vaughn - 466 u.s. 521 (1984) u.s. supreme court westinghouse electric corp. v. vaughn, 466 u.s. 521 (1984) 466 u.s. 521 westinghouse electric corp. v. vaughn et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit no. 82-2042. argued march 19, 1984 decided april 30, 1984 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 702 f.2d 137 . james w. moore argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were walter a. paulson ii and stuart i. saltman. clyde e. murphy argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii, charles stephen ralston, o. peter sherwood, ronald l. ellis, judith reed, and john w. walker. * [ footnote * ].....
Judgment:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN - 466 U.S. 521 (1984)
U.S. Supreme Court WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN, 466 U.S. 521 (1984) 466 U.S. 521

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. v. VAUGHN ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 82-2042.

Argued March 19, 1984
Decided April 30, 1984

Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 702 F.2d 137 .

James W. Moore argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Walter A. Paulson II and Stuart I. Saltman.

Clyde E. Murphy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, O. Peter Sherwood, Ronald L. Ellis, Judith Reed, and John W. Walker. *

[ Footnote * ] Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Barbara L. Neilson filed a brief for the Equal Employment Advisory Council as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 466 U.S. 521, 522




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //