Skip to content


Oklahoma Vs. Castleberry - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number471 U.S. 146
AppellantOklahoma
RespondentCastleberry
Excerpt:
.....1, 1985 678 p.2d 720, affirmed by an equally divided court. david w. lee, assistant attorney general of oklahoma, argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were michael c. turpen, attorney general, and hugh a. manning, assistant attorney general. charles foster cox argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents. * [ footnote * ] briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the state of california by john k. van de kamp, attorney general, robert r. granucci, assistant attorney general, and clifford k. thompson, jr., and ronald e. niver, deputy attorneys general; and for americans for effective law enforcement, inc., et al. by fred e. inbau, wayne w. schmidt, james p. manak, david crump, and daniel b. hales. per curiam. .....
Judgment:
OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY - 471 U.S. 146 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY, 471 U.S. 146 (1985) 471 U.S. 146

OKLAHOMA v. CASTLEBERRY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA

No. 83-2126.

Argued March 20, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985

    678 P.2d 720, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

David W. Lee, Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Michael C. Turpen, Attorney General, and Hugh A. Manning, Assistant Attorney General.

Charles Foster Cox argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents. *

[ Footnote * ] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of California by John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Robert R. Granucci, Assistant Attorney General, and Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., and Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attorneys General; and for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., et al. by Fred E. Inbau, Wayne W. Schmidt, James P. Manak, David Crump, and Daniel B. Hales.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 471 U.S. 146, 147




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //