Skip to content


Ramirez Vs. Indiana - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number471 U.S. 147
AppellantRamirez
RespondentIndiana
Excerpt:
.....19, 1985 decided april 1, 1985 455 n. e. 2d 609, affirmed by an equally divided court. kenneth f. ripple, by appointment of the court, 469 u.s. 1015, argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs were david t. link, douglas w. kenyon, mollie a. murphy, and richard s. myers. william e. daily, deputy attorney general of indiana, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief were linley e. pearson, attorney general, and lisa m. paunicka, deputy attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice powell took no part in the decision of this case. page 471 u.s. 147, 148
Judgment:
RAMIREZ v. INDIANA - 471 U.S. 147 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court RAMIREZ v. INDIANA, 471 U.S. 147 (1985) 471 U.S. 147

RAMIREZ v. INDIANA
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

No. 84-5059.

Argued March 19, 1985
Decided April 1, 1985

    455 N. E. 2d 609, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Kenneth F. Ripple, by appointment of the Court, 469 U.S. 1015, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were David T. Link, Douglas W. Kenyon, Mollie A. Murphy, and Richard S. Myers.

William E. Daily, Deputy Attorney General of Indiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linley E. Pearson, Attorney General, and Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 471 U.S. 147, 148




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //