Skip to content


Fugate Vs. New Mexico - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number470 U.S. 904
AppellantFugate
RespondentNew Mexico
Excerpt:
fugate v. new mexico - 470 u.s. 904 (1985) u.s. supreme court fugate v. new mexico, 470 u.s. 904 (1985) 470 u.s. 904 fugate v. new mexico certiorari to the supreme court of new mexico no. 83-6663. argued february 19, 1985 decided march 26, 1985 101 n. m. 58, 678 p.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided court. j. thomas sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the briefs was henry r. quintero. paul bardacke, attorney general of new mexico, argued the cause for respondent. with him on the briefs was anthony tupler, assistant attorney general. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided court. justice powell took no part in the decision of this case. page 470 u.s. 904, 1
Judgment:
FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO - 470 U.S. 904 (1985)
U.S. Supreme Court FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO, 470 U.S. 904 (1985) 470 U.S. 904

FUGATE v. NEW MEXICO
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

No. 83-6663.

Argued February 19, 1985
Decided March 26, 1985

101 N. M. 58, 678 P.2d 686, affirmed by an equally divided Court.

J. Thomas Sullivan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Henry R. Quintero.

Paul Bardacke, Attorney General of New Mexico, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Anthony Tupler, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the decision of this case.

Page 470 U.S. 904, 1




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //