Skip to content


The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vs. The Indian Overseas Bank Rep. By its Manager, Recovery Administrative Branch and Another - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtChennai High Court
Decided On
Case NumberW.P. Nos. 2675, 253 & 9750 of 2011, 46458 of 2002, 27409 & 31060 of 2005, 6267 & 469 of 2006, 21496 of 2008, 21358 of 2009
Judge
AppellantThe Assistant Commissioner (CT)
RespondentThe Indian Overseas Bank Rep. By its Manager, Recovery Administrative Branch and Another
Excerpt:
.....act, 2016 - section 41-mortgaged property - as to whether financial institution, which was secured creditor, or department of government concerned, would have 'priority of charge' over mortgaged property in question, with regard to tax and other dues - as to status and rights of third party purchaser of mortgaged property in question - court held - law having now come into force, naturally it would govern rights of parties in respect of even lis pending - answer question (a) in favour of financial institution, which is secured creditor having benefit of mortgaged property - in so far as question (b) is concerned, same is stated to relate only to auction sales, which may be carried out in pursuance to rights exercised by secured creditor having mortgage of property - this aspect..........in respect of the following issues:- ''a) as to whether the financial institution, which is a secured creditor, or the department of the government concerned, would have the 'priority of charge' over the mortgaged property in question, with regard to the tax and other dues. b) as to the status and the rights of a third party purchaser of the mortgaged property in question.'' 2. we are of the view that if there was at all any doubt, the same stands resolved by view of the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016, section 41 of the same seeking to introduce section 31b in the principal act, which reads as under:- ''31b. notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the rights of.....
Judgment:

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to forbear the 1 st respondent from proceeding with the recovery proceedings issued a ''Public Auction Notice'' in Dinakaran newspaper on 28.12.2010 for the sale of the property of the 2 nd respondent without confirming the arrears of Sales Tax or without wide promulgation for transfer for consideration for arrears of Sales Tax Rs.2,57,64,830/- due to the Petitioner Department for the period from 1997-98 to 1999-2000 on which charge is subsisting as this Court may deem fit.

Common Order:

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, C.J.

1. The writ petitions have been listed before the Full Bench in pursuance to the reference order in W.P.No.6267 of 2006 and W.P.No.253 of 2011, in respect of the following issues:-

''a) As to whether the Financial Institution, which is a secured creditor, or the department of the government concerned, would have the 'Priority of Charge' over the mortgaged property in question, with regard to the tax and other dues.

b) As to the status and the rights of a third party purchaser of the mortgaged property in question.''

2. We are of the view that if there was at all any doubt, the same stands resolved by view of the Enforcement of Security Interest and Recovery of Debts Laws and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 2016, Section 41 of the same seeking to introduce Section 31B in the Principal Act, which reads as under:-

''31B. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the rights of secured creditors to realise secured debts due and payable to them by sale of assets over which security interest is created, shall have priority and shall be paid in priority over all other debts and Government dues including revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due to the Central Government, State Government or local authority.

Explanation. - For the purposes of this section, it is hereby clarified that on or after the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, in cases where insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings are pending in respect of secured assets of the borrower, priority to secured creditors in payment of debt shall be subject to the provisions of that Code.''

3. There is, thus, no doubt that the rights of a secured creditor to realise secured debts due and payable by sale of assets over which security interest is created, would have priority over all debts and Government dues including revenues, taxes, cesses and rates due to the Central Government, State Government or Local Authority. This section introduced in the Central Act is with ''notwithstanding'' clause and has come into force from 01.09.2016.

4. The law having now come into force, naturally it would govern the rights of the parties in respect of even a lis pending.

5. The aforesaid would, thus, answer question (a) in favour of the financial institution, which is a secured creditor having the benefit of the mortgaged property.

6. In so far as question (b) is concerned, the same is stated to relate only to auction sales, which may be carried out in pursuance to the rights exercised by the secured creditor having a mortgage of the property. This aspect is also covered by the introduction of Section 31B, as it includes ''secured debts due and payable to them by sale of assets over which security interest is created''.

7. We, thus, answer the aforesaid reference accordingly.

8. The matters be placed before the roster Division Bench for dealing with the individual cases.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //