Queen Empress Vs. Purshotam Kala - Court Judgment
|Judge||Nanabhai Haridas and ;W. Wedderburn, JJ.|
defamation - penal code (act xlv of 1845), section 499, exception 9--good faith--malice, want of--tampering with witnesses, imputation of. - indian succession act (39 of 1925), section 63: [s.b. sinha & cyriac joseph, jj] will validity - deceased, was a very wealthy person - he floated several companies - he left behind his daughters, s and j - he was suffering from various diseases including some neurological ones - for his treatment, he used to frequently visit united states of america accompanied by his wife and daughter - by reason of a will, he is said to have bequeathed 50% of his property to s and 50% to j in a letter addressed to the 1st respondent, viz., s, he is purported to have recorded that the he had given all his shares to her - will was not only unnatural but was.....nanabhai haridas, j.1. we agree with the view taken by the sessions judge, and order that the conviction and sentence be set aside.
Nanabhai Haridas, J.
1. We agree with the view taken by the Sessions Judge, and order that the conviction and sentence be set aside.