Skip to content

Manohar Ramchandra and anr. Vs. Lakshman Mahadev - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
Decided On
Reported in(1885)ILR9Bom371
AppellantManohar Ramchandra and anr.
RespondentLakshman Mahadev
civil procedure code, act xiv of 1882, section 407, clause (d) - pauper--vakil--agreement--subject-matter. - maharashtra scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, de-notified tribes (vimukta jatis), nomadic tribes, other backward classes and special backward category (regulation of issuance and verification of) caste certificate act (23 of 2001), sections 6 & 10: [s.b. mhase, a.p. deshpande & p.b. varale, jj] caste certificate petitioner seeking appointment against the post reserved for member of schedule tribe his caste certificate was invalidated subsequently held, his appointment would not be protected. the observations/directions issued by supreme court in para 36 of judgment in the case of state v millind reported in 2001 91) mah. lj sc 1 is not the law declared by supreme court under.....charles sargent, c.j.1. we concur in the opinion of the subordinate judge.

Charles Sargent, C.J.

1. We concur in the opinion of the Subordinate Judge.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //