Fazal Muhammad Vs. Phul Kuar - Court Judgment
|Court||Allahabad High Court|
|Judge||Robert Stuart, C.J., ;Pearson, ;Spankie and ;Oldfield, JJ.|
.....board. the school tribunal constituted under section 8 of the maharashtra act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by the cantonment board. teacher employed in the school run by cantonment board being covered under rule 2 (f) of the cantonment fund servants rules, 1937 can file appeal under rules 13, 14 and 15 to authorities provided therein against any order imposing any penalties etc. [deolali cantonment board v usha devidas dongre, 1993 mah. lj 74; 1993 lab ic 1858 overruled]. -- maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulations act, 1978
[act no. 3/1978]. sections 9 & 2(21): jurisdiction of school tribunal whether a school run by cantonment board is not a recognised.....1. the full bench is of opinion that the appeal is beyond time and not entitled to be admitted. it is therefore dismissed with costs.
1. The Full Bench is of opinion that the appeal is beyond time and not entitled to be admitted. It is therefore dismissed with costs.